Detection of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus Using Serological and Biological Assays
PDF

Keywords

 GFLV, grapevine, inoculation, Nicotiana.

How to Cite

Gülcan Tarla, & Mehmet Asil Yilmaz. (2015). Detection of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus Using Serological and Biological Assays. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 11, 343–347. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.49

Abstract

The production of grapevine is important agricultural sector in Turkey. But, the production is lower than the other Mediterranean countries. One of the main reasons of low yield is many viruses’ diseases. The nepoviruse diseases are responsible for significant lossesin vineyards. Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) is the most important deadly virus among them. It is transmitted by graft and vector nematodes. It has not been studied enough about this virus in our country. There is not enough detailed research on this virus in our country. In this study, the maintenance of GFLV in vineyards and their occurrence areas were determined in Adana and Mersin provinces by serological and biological assays. Out of total 384 grapevine samples, 63 plants (16.4%) were found to be infected with GFLV by double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA). In addition to this, as herbaceous indicator plants; Nicotiana benthamiana Domin., N. tabacum L., N. rustia L., Chenopodium amaranthicolor Coste et Reyn., C. quinoa Wild., Cucumis sativus L., and Gomprena globosa L. were used in biological assays. But chloroticlocallesions were observed only on Nicotiana benthamiana Domin. among weedy indicator plants by mechanical transmission.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.49
PDF

References

Mattia F, Imazio S, Grassi F, Doulati H, Scienza A, Labra M. Study of genetic relationships between wild and domesticated grapevine distributed from Middle East regions to European countries. Rendiconti Lincei 2008; 19: 223-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12210-008-0016-6

Anonymous, 2013. www.fao.org. FAOSTAT-Crop Production, 2013.

Akba? B, Erdiller G. Following Virus Diseases of Connective area Turkey VIII. Congress of Phytopathology. Ankara 21-25 Eylül 1998; s.149-157.

Köklü G, Digiaro M, Savino V. A Survey of Grapevine Viruses in Turkish Thrace. Phytopathologia Mediteranea 1998; 37: 140-142.

Çi?sar I, Yilmaz MA. Dedection of Grapevine Viruses by Serological Methods in Southeast Anatolia. In: Proceedings 13 th Meeting of ICVG. Adelaide (AU) 2000; p. 143.

Çigsar I. Southeastern Anatolia Region and Nevsehir Biological and Serological Detection with harmful viruses and virus disease in vineyards in the province and are Characterization of Two New nepovirus. PhD Thesis. Zhou. Institute of Science and Technology 2002; 111 s.

Andret-Link P, Schmitt-Keichinger C, Demangeat G, Komar V, Fuchs M. The specific transmission of grapevine fanleaf virus by its nematode vector Xiphinema index is solely determined by the viral coat protein. Virol. 2004; 320(1): 12-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2003.11.022

Pesqueira AM, García-Berrios JJ, Barrasa M, Cabaleiro C. Economic Impact of Leafroll Disease in Vineyards of the Cultivar Albariño in Rías Baixas (Spain), Proceedings of the 17th Congress of ICVG, Davis, California, USA October 7–14, 2012; p. 55-58.

Hewitt WB, Rash DJ, Goheen AC. Nematode vector of soilborne fanleaf virus of grapevines. Phytopathology 1958; 48: 586-595.

Zyl S, Vivier MA, Walker MA. Xiphinema index and its Relationship to Grapevines: A review. S. A. J. of Enology and Viticulture 2012; 33(1): 232.

Kepenekci ?A. New Genus Tr?chodorus Cobb (Stubby Root Nematode) (Triplonchida: Trichodoridae) and Preliminary List of Virus Vector Nematodes Associated In Turkey. Mun Ent Zool 2014; 9: 227-244.

Kepenekci ?, Toktay H, Evlice E. Plant Parasitic and Virus Vector Nematodes Associated with Vineyards in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Pakistan J Zool 2014; 46(3): 866-870.

Demangeat G, Voisin R, Minot JC, Bosselut N, Fuchs M, Esmenjaud D. Survival of Xiphinema index in Vineyard Soil and Retention of Grapevine fanleaf virus Over Extended Time in the Absence of Host Plants. Phytopathology 2005; 95(10): 1151-1156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-1151

Andret-Link P, Laporte C, Valat L, Ritzenthaler C, Demangeat G, Vigne E, Laval V, Pfeiffer P, Stussi-Garaud C, Fuchs M. Grapevine fanleaf virus: Still a major threat to the grapevine industry. Journal of Plant Pathology 2004a; 86: 183-195.

Hefferon K, Fuchs M. Nepovirus replication. In recent advances in RNA virus replication: Hefferon KL. Eds. Trivandrum, India: Transworld Research Network 2006; pp. 229-245.

Clark MF, Adams AN. Charecteristics of Microplate Method of Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay for the Dedection of Plant Viruses. J Gen Virol 1977; 34: 475-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-34-3-475

Dijkstra J, Jager CP. Practical Plant Virology: Protocol and Exercises (Springer Lab. Manuel). Springer-Verlag 1998; 459s.

Hanna E, Digiaro M, Elbeaino T, Choueiri E, Jawhar J, Martelli GP. Incidence of viruses and nematode vectors in Lebanese vineyards. J Phytopathol 2008; 156: 304-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01336.x

Nogay A, Agdaci M, Gursoy YZ. A Study on Detection of the Virus Diseases and Vectors in Vineyards and American Grapevine Rootstocks in the Marmara Region. VII. Turkey Congress of Phytopathology. Adana 26-29 September 1995; s. 247-251.

Köklü G, Baloglu S, Yilmaz MA, Ozaslan MA. Study on Determining the Prevalence of Grapevine Fanleaf Virus in Vine Varieties in Thrace Region Vineyards. VIII. Turkey Congress of Phytopathology. Ankara 21-25 September 1998; s. 328-330.

?nal S. Ba? Virüs Hastal?klar?. Tekirda? Viticulture Research Institute Publications 1983; 24: 9-33.

Özaslan M, Balo?lu S, Yilmaz MA Virus Diseases of Locally Grown grapevine varieties in Kahramanmaras region. VI. Turkey Congress of Phytopathology. Proceedings.Turkey Phytopathology Society 1991; 401-406.

Yui YD, Hu Hancheng H, Humanting L, Xingqi G. Detection Fanleaf Virus by ELISA. J. Shandong Agricultural University 1994; 25: 82-86.

Al-Tamimi N, Digiaro M, Savion V. Viruses of grapevine in Jordan. Phytopathol Medit 1998; 37: 122-126.

El-Awady MAM, El-Den KME, Said MM, Ismail SE, El-Tarras AA. Development of the diagnoses tools for Vitis spp. grown in Taif- Saudi Arabia infected with Grapevine fanleaf nepovirus. Life Science Journal 2013; 10(4): 1665-1672.

Hewitt BW. Virus Diseases of Grapevine. Plant Diseases. The Year Book of Agriculture 1953; 744-753.

Hewitt BW. Some Virus and Virus-Like Diseases of Grapevines. Bull Calif Dep Agric 1954; 43: 47-64.

Martelli REF. Diagnosis of plant diseases. Academic press, New York 1993; pp. 145- 146.

Tanaka H. Virus Infection of Grapevine Rootstock Varieties in Japan. Bulletin of the Fruit Tree Res. Sta. Tsukuba, Ibaraki. Japan 1988; 15: 83-91 Abs.

Raski DJ, Goheen AC. Comparison of 1,3 Dichloropropene (Dp) ve Methyl Bromide for Control of X. index and Grapevine Fanleaf Degeneration Complex. Am J Enolog Viticulture 1988; 39(4): 334-336. Abs.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2015 Gülcan Tarla , Mehmet Asil Yilmaz