Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Sowing methods and harvesting times are the important management considerations for getting the optimum yield and quality of fodder crops. This study, investigated the influence of sowing methods and harvesting times on the growth, yield and quality of sweet sorghum. Chinese sweet sorghum was grown by broadcast method, 30 cm apart lines and 45 cm apart lines and harvested after 60, 75 and 90 days after sowing, respectively. All the tested sowing patterns and harvesting times considerably affected the growth, yield and quality of sweet sorghum. However, sowing in 30 cm apart rows produced maximum leaves per plant (13.09), fresh forage yield (38.1 t ha-1), dry matter yield (4.85 t ha-1), crude proteins (8.9%), ash contents (11%) and sugar contents (12.8%), respectively. Similarly, harvesting after 90 days of sowing gave highest leaves per plant (14.72), fresh forage yield (45.1 t ha-1), dry matter yield (5.60 t ha-1), ash contents (12.2%) and sugar contents (14.1%), respectively. These results suggested that sowing in 30 cm apart lines and harvesting after 90 days of sowing improved the growth, yield and quality of sweet sorghum under the semiarid region of Faisalabad.
References
Govt. of Pakistan. Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan 2012-13. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock Division, Islamabad, Pakistan 2013; pp 3-4.
Sarwar H, Mishra JS, Kumar A. Effect of planting geometry and forage legume intercropping system on the yield and quality of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). M.Sc. (Hons) Agri. Thesis, Deptt. of Agron. Univ. Agric., Faisalabad 2002.
Anonymous. Fodder production in Pakistan. Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad and Food and Agricultural Organization, Islamabad 2000; pp. 9.
Malede B. Role of Seeding Rates and Cutting Stages on Yield and Quality of Forage Intercropping in the Case of North Gondar. Ethiopia, LAP, LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Germany 2013; ISBN 978-3-659-25690-5-1.
Balole TV, Legwaila GM, Van-Den-Berg J. Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Record from Protabase. Brink, M. & Belay, G. (Editors). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa / Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands 2006; pp. 70-74.
Dahlberg J. Classification and characterization of sorghum. In C. W. Smith and R. A. Frederiksen (ed.) Sorghum origin, history, and production. John Wiley Publishers, New York NY, 2000; pp. 99-130.
Afzal M, Ahmad AUS, Zamir SI. Performance of multicut forage sorghum under various sowing methods and nitrogen application rates. J Animal Plant Sci 2013; 23(1): 232-239.
Rashid A, Himayatullah. Effect of planting geometry and legumes intercropping system on the yield of sorghum. Asian J Pl Sci 2003; 2: 361-364. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2003.361.364
Ahmad A, Ahmad R, Mahmood N. Production potential and quality of mixed sorghum forage under different intercropping systems and planting patterns. Pak J Agri Sci 2007; 44(2): 203-207.
Ayub M, Shoaib M. Studies on fodder yield and quality of sorghum grown alone and in mixture with guara under different planting techniques. Pak J Agri Sci 2009; 46: 25-29.
Firdous R, Gilani AH, Barque AR Akram M. Effect of stage of growth and cultivars on chemical composition of whole maize plant and its morphological fraction. Pak J Agri Sci 1996; 33(1-4): 54-58.
Ayub M, Nadeem MA, Tanveer A, Husnain A. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and harvesting times on growth, yield and quality of sorghum fodder. Asian J Plant Sci 2002; 1: 304-307. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.304.307
Iqbal A, Ayub M, Akbar N, Ahmad R. Growth and forage yield response of maize-legume mixed cropping to different sowing techniques. Pak J Agri Sci 2006; 43: 126-130.
Rao SS, Patil JV, Prasad PVV, Reddy DCS, Mishra JS, Umakanth AV, Reddy BVS, Kumar AA. International crops research institute for the semi-arid tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India 2009.
Homer DC, Pratt PF. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters, Div. of Agriculture Science, University of California, Davis 1961.
AOAC. Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA, 2003; pp. 780, Method No. 920.85.
Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DA. Principles and procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach, 3rdEdition. McGraw Hill Book Int. Co., New York 1997; 172-177.
Ibrahim M, Rafiq M, Sultan A, Akram M, Goheer MA. Green fodder yield and quality evaluation of maize and cowpea sown alone and in combination. J Agric Res 2006; 44: 15-21.
Iqbal MN. Performance of pearl millet (pennisetum amaricanum L.) fodder grown in association with clusterbean and cowpea.M.Sc.(Hons) thesis, dept. of Agron., Univ. Agri., Faisalabad 2013; 65-70.
Ayub M, Tanveer A, Nadeem MA, Shah SM. Studies on the fodder yield and quality of sorghum grown alone and in mixture with rice bean. Pak J Life Soc Sci 2004; 2: 46-48.
Keerio HA, Singh SP. Effect of intercropping on yield of hybrid sorghum under different nitrogen levels. Pak J Agri Res 2000; 6: 26-33.
Makeri EE, Ugherughe PO. Evaluation of the forage potentials of pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical environment. J Agron Crop Sci 2000; 169: 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1992.tb01043.x
Singh PK, Jadhav AS. Intercropping of sorghum with pigeonpea, groundnut an soybean under varying planting geometry. Ind J Dry land Agric Res Dev 2003; 18: 126-129.
Botha LT, Rethman NFG, 2004. Yield and chemical coposition of pennisetum glaucum L. at different cutting frequencies. Applied Plant Sci 8: 37-42.
Hong KS, Lee HJ, Rhyu JH. Response of maize and soybean canopy structure, dry matter and yield to intercropping. Korea J Crop Sci 2003; 32: 357-368.
Abbas M. Studies on growth, yield and quality of sorghum fodder sown alone and with legumes in different geometrical patterns. M.Sc. (Hons.) Thesis, Deptt. of Agron., Univ. Agri., Faisalabad 2005.
Ram SN, Singh B. Growth yield and quality of forage sorghum by intercropping, harvesting time and nitrogen fertilization under rainfed conditions. Ind J Dryland Agri Res Dev 2003; 18: 167- 172.
Keshwa GL, Yadav ML. Effect of nitrogen and cutting management on growth and fodder yield on bajra varieties. Haryana J Agron 2005; 5: 188-190.
McCormick ME, Morris DR, Ackerson BA, Blouin DC. Ratoon cropping forage sorghum for silage: Yield, fermentation, and nutrition. Agron J 2000; 87: 952-957. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700050030x
Butler T, Bean B. Forage Sorghum Production Guide. Extension Agronomist 2002; 1: 5-7.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2017 Muhammad Umer Chattha, Aisf Iqbal, Muhammad Umair Hassan, Muhammad Bilal Chattha, Wajid Ishaque, Muhammad Usman, Sadia Khan, Muhammad Tauqir Fayyaz , Muhammad Aman Ullah