Influence of Rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64) on Performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry
PDF

Keywords

Rootstock, Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64, Prunus avium, 0900 Ziraat.

How to Cite

Erdal Aglar, & Kenan Yıldız. (2021). Influence of Rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa, SL 64) on Performance of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 10, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2014.10.09

Abstract

 This study was carried out in order to determine the effect of rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, MaxMa 14 and SL 64) on performance of sweet cherry cultivar ‘0 900 Ziraat’ during 2010-2013 years. The trail in randomized block design was established as to factorial design. Each graft combination included 20 trees. The trees was trained as Spanish Bush training system. At the end of study, effect of rootstocks on vegetative growth was found significant. It has been determined that the trees grafted on SL 64 and MaxMa 14 rootstocks were more vigorous than the those grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6. The rootstocks formed significant differences at the precocity. While the first blooming on the trees grafted on Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks occurred at the second year after planting, the first blooming on the trees on MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks occurred at fourth year after planting. It has been determined that occur significant differences on yield per tree and yield efficiency among rootstocks. In terms of yield per tree and yield efficiency, While the lowest value was in SL 64 rootstock, the highest value was recorded in Gisela 5, and it has been determined that the differences between three rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6 and MaxMa 14) were not significant. While fruits weight varied according to the rootstock used in study, the trees grafted on Gisela 5 had the smallest fruit. Accompanied with differences between MaxMa 14 and SL 64 rootstocks were not significant, the biggest fruits were produced on trees grafted on SL 64 rootstock. As a result of the statistical analysis, it has determined that the rootstocks that used in trial did not create significant differences on soluble solids content (SSC) value. One of the most significant diagnosis was 6 % mortality rate that occurred on trees grafted Gisela 5 and Gisela 6 rootstocks.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2014.10.09
PDF

References

FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. www.fao.org. 2013.

Özçaıran R, Ünal A, Özeker E,

sfendiyarolu M. Ilıman

klim Meyve Türleri Cilt: 1. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 553: p. 227.

Long EL. Cherry Training Systems: Selection and Development. A Pasific Northwest Extension Publication Oregon State Univertsity- University of Idaho- Washington State University PNW 543 February 2003.

Long EL, Kaiser C. Sweet Cherry Rootstocks for the Pasific Northwest. A Pasific Northwest Extension Publication Oregon State Univertsity- University of Idaho- Washington State University PNW 619 Semtember 2010.

Forshey CG. Training and Pruning Apple Trees. Ecological Agriculture Prıjects. McGill University. Cornell Cooperation Extension Publication / Info Bullettin -112.

Jime ́nez S, Garı ́n A, Betra ́n JA, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA. Influence of different vigour cherry rootstocks on leaves and shoots mineral composition. Sci Hortic 2007: 112: 73-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.010

Blakova J, Drahoova H, Hlui kova I. Tree vigour, cropping, and phenology of sweet cherries in two systems of tree training on dwarf rootstocks. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 37: 127-138.

Cantín CM, Pinochet J, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MÁ. Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’ and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’ sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae 123: 329-335.

Peterson DL, Whiting DM, Wolford DS. Technology update on mechanical harvesting system for fresh market sweet cherries. Proceedings of 98th Annual Meeting of the Washington State Hort. Assoc pp. 177-183.

Raduni M, Jazbec A, Pecina M, osi T, Pavi i N. Growth and yield of the sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) as affected by training system. Afr J Biotechnol 2011; 10(24): 4901-4906.

Sitarek M, Bartosiewicz B. Influence of fıve clonal rootstocks on the growth, productıvıty and fruıt qualıty of ‘Sylvıa’ and ‘Karına’ sweet cherry trees. J Fruit Ornamental Plant Res 2012; 20(2): 5-10.

Tareen MJ, Tareen MN. Effect of Rootstocks on “Bing” Cherry Grown in Balochistan (Pakistan). Internatıonal journal of agrıculture & bıology 1560–8530/2004/06–3–565–567.

Gonçalves B, Moutinho-Pereira J, Santos A, Silva AP, Bacelar E, Correıa C, Rosa E. Scion–rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiology. Victoria, Canada 26: 93-104

Whiting DM, Lang G, Ophard D. Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield and fruit quality. Hortscience 2005; 40(3): 582-586.

Fajt N, Folini L, Bassi G, Siegler H. Lapins on Ten Cherry Rootstocks in the Alpe Adria Region. 6 th International Cherry Symposium, 15-19 November, Renaca-Vina del Mar, Chile-2009.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.