Abstract
The studies were carried out on toxic effects of lead acetate, which could contaminate the environment, such as food, water, air and soil, therefore insects could be influenced easily by the lead., Bactrocera dorsalis was studied at 48 hours post treatment, under the effects of lead acetate, in different concentrations. It was observed that, under the effects of lead abnormalities, and deformity were developed in the larvae of flies. Thus these flies could present a useful module for the quick transmission of the environmental hazards of lead, which exerts a specific physiological and morphological effect on their bodies.
References
Tachi K, Nishime S. Cytogenetic effects of lead acetate on rat bone marrow cells. Arch Environ Heal 1975; 403: 144-47.
Michailova P. Comparative karyological studies of three species of the genus Glyptotendipis Kieff. (Diptera, Chironomidae) from Hungary and Bulgaria and Glyptendipis salinus sp. n. from Bulgaria. Folia Biol (Krakwo) 1987b; 35: 43-56.
Short C. Varion in sister-chromatid exchange among 100 species of the general insect population. Proc Environ 1990; 29: 140-49.
Watson N. Chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in insects of lead polluted. Exp Sci 1999; 90: 64-69.
Wilson BS. Sister chromatid exchange in larvae of insects. Lab 1995; 62: 135-44.
Walter R. Cyntheses prozesse an den Riesenchromosomen Von. Glyptotendipes. J Sci 2000; 128: 80-85.
Porter DM. Mutagenicity new horizons in genetic toxicology. Proc Tox 2002; 55: 32-37.
Ramel S. Chromosomal aberrations in insects. Environ Sci 2003; 16: 119-27.
Talbot PS. Sister-chromated exchange frequency correlated with age, sex and lead poisoning. Environ Tox 2004; 25: 27-33.
Margim A. Chromosome affected in experimental lead poisoning. Tox 2005; 41: 6-14.
Michailova P. The effect of metal compounds on chromosome segregation. Ist. Nat. Conf. Plovidiv, 1987a; pp. 168-173.
Timmermans KP. Heavy metal body burden in insects larvae as related to their feeding behaviour. 1988; Symp. Abst., 76.
Qureshi ZA, Hussain T, Siddiqui QH. Relative preference of mango varities by Dacus. Zonata (Saunders) and D. dorsalis Hendel. Pakistan J Zool 1991; 23(1): 85-87.
Kapoor UC, Agarwal ML. Fruit-flies and their natural enemies in India. Proc. Int. symp.Fruit flies of economic importance, Athens, Greec 1982; pp. 104-106.
Kapoor UC. Indian Tephritidae with their recorded hosts. Orient Insects 1970; 4: 207-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00305316.1970.10433957
Drew RAI, Hancock D. The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in asia. Bull Entomol Res Suppl., No. 2. Glyptotendipes J Sc; 1994; 128: 80-85.
Bridges RG, Ricketts J, Cox JT. The replacement of lipid-bound choline by other bases in the phospholipids of the housefly, Musca domestica. J Insect Physiol 1965; 225-236.
Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bactriophageT4. Nature 1970; 227: 680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
Tiselius A. A new apparatus for electrophoretic analysis of colloidal mixtures. Trans Faraday Soc 1937; 33: 524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/tf9373300524
Andrew AT. Electrophoresis: Theory, techniques and biochemical and clinical applications. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1986.
Nukhet AB, Elizabeth A, Franklin NE. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on 1lead-exposed PC-12 cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol USA 2005; 49: 119-23.
Corey OG, Galvao CL. Plomo. Serie Vigilancia 8. Metepec, Edo. De México. Centro Panamericano de Ecología Humana y Salud Org Panam Salud O M S; 1989; pp. 103.
Roy NK. Mutagenesis and comutagenesis by lead compounds. Res 1992; 298: 97-103.
Friedberg EC, Walker G, Siede W. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, 1995; pp. 16-7.
Chandrik M, Arijit G, Parimalendu H. Influence of cadmium on growth, survival and clutch size of a common Indian short horned grasshopper, Oxya fuscovittata. American-Eurasian J Toxicol Sci 2009; 1: 32-6.
Kalajdzic P, Stamenkovic-Radak M, Andjelkovic M. The effect of different concentrations of lead on inversion polymorphism in Drosophila subobscura. Hereditas 2006; 143: 41-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01939.x