Fragmentation Analysis For Scalable Wireless Local Area Networks
PDF

Keywords

 Wireless Networks, Fragmentation, Network Delay, Network Scalability, P2P Networks

How to Cite

Minhaj Ahmad Khan. (2021). Fragmentation Analysis For Scalable Wireless Local Area Networks. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 8(2), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2012.08.02.32

Abstract

Wireless networks are being deployed widely to provide network connectivity without requiring the web of physical wires. A collection of a small number of workstations connected using a wireless network forms a wireless local area network (WLAN) that follows the IEEE 802.11 standard. In a WLAN, the communication takes place using packets whose sizes may vary and have a significant impact on the delay incurred during transmission. In this regard, fragmentation may play a vital role in reducing the delay for efficient transmission across the network. This paper analyzes the performance of WLANs with respect to the packet fragmentation. We simulate three network scenarios having 4, 8 and 12 wireless workstations respectively. The scenarios are simulated using OPNET IT Guru Academic Edition v 9.1 while incorporating a peer-to-peer (P2P) based communication model for each scenario. We compare the performance of non-fragmented and fragmented communication in terms of network delay and throughput. Our results show that the fragmentation minimizes the delay and increases the throughput, however its impact is highly dependent on the size of the underlying network.

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2012.08.02.32
PDF

References

IEEE-CompSc. IEEE Standards for Information Technology -- Telecommunication and information exchange between systems -- Local and metropolitan area networks -- Specific requires Part-11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications

Ferguson P, Huston G. Quality of Service: Delivering QoS on the Internet and in Corporate Networks. John Wiley & Sons, USA 1998.

IETF. Framework for IP Performance Metrics---RFC 2330. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC-2330, 1998. Available: htp://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2330.txt.

ITU-T. Terms and definitions related to quality of service and network performance including dependability. ITU-T Recommendation E.800, 1994.

IETF. Specification of Guaranteed Quality of Service -- RFC 2212 (Standards Track). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC-2212, 1997; Available: http://www/ietf.org/rfc/rfc2212.txt.

ITU-T. Internet protocol aspects - Quality of service and network performance. ITU-T Recommendation Y.1540, 2007.

Modiano E. An adaptive algorithm for optimizing the packet size used in wireless ARQ protocols. Wireless Networks 1999; 5: 279-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019111430288

IETF. Internet Protocol: DARPA Internet Program -- Program Specification -- RFC 791. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC-791, 1981. Available: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791.

Clark D. IP datagram re-assembly algorithms -- RFC 815. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) RFC-791, 1982. Available: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc815.

Geier J. Improving WLAN performance with fragmentation. WI-FI Planet Tutorials, 2002, Available: http:///www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1468331

OPNET Tech. OPNET IT Guru Academic Edition. OPNET Technologies, USA, 2011. Available: http://www.opnet.com/university_program/itguru_academic_edition/